Don’t try to convince the primary examiner at an EPO oral hearing, go for the other two members instead

When your patent application faces an oral hearing at the end of the examination procedure, there is a subtle difference between the EPO and the GPTO:

  • GPTO: the hearing is handled by a single examiner (the same who also handled the written procedure)
  • EPO: the hearing is handled by a panel of three examiners (the primary examiner in charge of the written procedure and two further examiners)

So if you cannot convince the EPO primary examiner, you still have a chance of convincing the other two members of the examining division.

Therefore, your European patent attorney should always plead his case so that the two members less involved in the case can easily follow and make up their own minds.

I’ve seen countless cases where the primary examiner finally gets overruled by the other two members. The length of the examining division’sĀ deliberations while you wait outside is a good indicator of the extent to which they disagree šŸ˜‰

Happy innovating!

P.S.: This was just the tip of the iceberg. If you want more, get on my email list. I usually write an update every two weeks or so – it features inside knowledge and practical tips on European software patents. You can subscribe here.

Hi, I'm a European patent attorney with a computer science background and a partner at one of the largest IP firms in Europe. About | Contact